Retaliation Is Illegal: Your Rights After Reporting Unpaid Overtime

12โ€“18 minutes

Retaliation Is Illegal: Your Rights After Reporting Unpaid Overtime

You noticed something wrong with your paycheck. You raised it with your manager. You called the Department of Labor. Or maybe you joined a co-worker’s wage lawsuit. Then, suddenly, your hours were cut. Your shift was changed. Your manager wrote you up over something trivial. In some cases, you were fired outright. However, federal law does not allow this. When a worker reports unpaid overtime or other wage violations, the Fair Labor Standards Act specifically protects that worker from being punished. In addition, workers who face retaliation can recover significant damages, sometimes far more than the underlying wage claim itself. Here is what the law actually says about retaliation, what counts as protected activity, and what to do if your employer punishes you for speaking up.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fair Labor Standards Act prohibits employers from discharging, demoting, or otherwise discriminating against workers who report wage violations.
  • Protected activity includes formal complaints to the Department of Labor, private lawsuits, testimony in wage proceedings, and internal complaints to supervisors, whether written or oral.
  • The Supreme Court confirmed in Kasten v. Saint-Gobain that oral complaints count as protected activity under the FLSA.
  • Retaliation covers more than firing. Schedule cuts, demotions, unfavorable transfers, threats, and pretextual discipline may all qualify.
  • Workers who prove retaliation may recover reinstatement, back pay, front pay, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees, and in some circuits punitive and emotional distress damages.

The Basic Rule: Federal Law Protects Workers Who Speak Up

Congress built the anti-retaliation provision into the FLSA for a straightforward reason. Without protection, workers would be afraid to complain about wage violations. As a result, most violations would go unreported. Employers would keep breaking the law without consequence. To prevent this, Section 215(a)(3) of the FLSA makes it unlawful for an employer to punish a worker for asserting FLSA rights.

In practice, this protection is powerful. For example, workers who face retaliation may often recover more in damages for the retaliation itself than for the underlying wage violation. In addition, the retaliation claim is a separate cause of action. As a result, workers can recover on both the underlying wage claim and the retaliation claim at the same time.

29 U.S.C. ยง 215(a)(3) / FLSA Anti-Retaliation Provision

It is unlawful for any employer “to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to [the FLSA], or has testified or is about to testify in such proceeding.”

Federal courts have interpreted this provision broadly. As a result, the FLSA protects a wide range of worker activity beyond just formally filing a lawsuit or complaint with a government agency.

What Counts as “Protected Activity”

To bring an FLSA retaliation claim, a worker must first show they engaged in protected activity. Fortunately, the definition is broad. In fact, several categories of worker action qualify.

Filing a Formal Complaint

Filing a wage complaint with the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division clearly qualifies as protected activity. Similarly, filing a private lawsuit alleging FLSA violations qualifies. In addition, filing a complaint with a state labor agency about a wage violation often qualifies.

Making an Oral Complaint

Workers do not need to file anything in writing to be protected. In Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 563 U.S. 1 (2011), the Supreme Court held that oral complaints qualify as protected activity. However, the complaint must be “sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it” as an assertion of FLSA rights. In other words, casual venting will generally not qualify. Still, a clear oral statement to a supervisor about unpaid overtime or wage violations should qualify.

Internal Complaints to Supervisors

Most federal circuits protect workers who complain internally to a supervisor or HR, even without going to the government. For example, the Second Circuit in Greathouse v. JHS Security joined at least nine other circuits in extending FLSA protection to intra-company complaints. As a result, a worker who tells a supervisor that overtime has been shorted may be protected from retaliation, even if the worker never files anything with an agency or a court.

Testifying or Being “About to Testify”

Testifying in an FLSA proceeding is protected activity. In addition, being “about to testify” is also protected. In Uronis v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., 49 F.4th 263 (3d Cir. 2022), the Third Circuit held that this protection extends to workers who are potential members of a pending FLSA collective action. As a result, if a worker fits within a putative class in a wage lawsuit and the employer refuses to hire that worker for that reason, the worker may have a retaliation claim.

Cooperating With Investigations

Workers who cooperate with a DOL investigation, provide information to investigators, or serve as witnesses are also protected. In addition, workers who help co-workers file wage claims may be protected.

What Counts as “Retaliation”

Retaliation covers a wide range of adverse actions. Firing is the most obvious. However, the FLSA’s language extends much further. Any employer action that would deter a reasonable worker from asserting FLSA rights may qualify. In practice, common forms of retaliation include:

  • Firing or termination, including layoffs pretextually justified by other reasons.
  • Demotion to a lower position or less desirable job.
  • Pay cuts or reduction in wages.
  • Reduction in hours that reduces the worker’s income.
  • Schedule changes designed to punish the worker or make employment more difficult.
  • Reassignment to worse duties, worse shifts, or worse locations.
  • Denial of promotion or refusal to hire for a promotion.
  • Discipline for pretextual reasons such as sudden write-ups over minor issues that were previously overlooked.
  • Threats against the worker, family members, or others.
  • Immigration-related threats that use status as a tool of intimidation.
  • Blacklisting or interfering with future employment opportunities.
  • Constructive discharge where the employer makes conditions so intolerable the worker feels forced to quit.
  • Bad references given to prospective employers because of the wage complaint.

The Three-Part Test for a Retaliation Claim

To succeed on an FLSA retaliation claim, a worker generally must show three things. First, the worker engaged in protected activity. Second, the employer took an adverse action against the worker. Third, there was a causal connection between the two.

In practice, the first two elements are often straightforward. However, the causal connection can be the most contested element. Employers usually claim they had a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse action. As a result, workers must be prepared to show that the employer’s stated reason is a pretext for retaliation.

Timing Matters

Courts often rely on timing to determine causation. For example, if an employer fires a worker one week after the worker filed a wage complaint, the close timing itself can support a retaliation claim. In fact, “temporal proximity” (the closeness in time between the protected activity and the adverse action) is one of the most powerful pieces of evidence in retaliation cases.

However, timing is not the only factor. Courts also consider:

  • The employer’s stated reason for the adverse action, and whether that reason holds up under scrutiny.
  • Whether the employer treated similarly situated workers differently.
  • Whether the employer’s story has shifted or become inconsistent.
  • Whether the worker’s performance history matches the employer’s stated concerns.
  • Whether the worker was disciplined for conduct the employer had previously tolerated.

Still, a suspicious pattern of adverse actions after a wage complaint is often the starting point for a valid retaliation claim.

Example 1 / The Warehouse Worker Fired Two Weeks After Complaining

A warehouse worker notices that his employer is not paying for pre-shift setup time. In March, he raises this concern with his supervisor and with HR. Two weeks later, the employer fires him for “poor attendance,” even though his attendance record for the prior year had been unremarkable. Under Kasten, his oral complaints to management may qualify as protected activity. In addition, the timing between the complaint and the termination may support an inference of retaliation. As a result, he may have valid claims for both the underlying unpaid wages and for retaliation.

Example 2 / The Restaurant Server Whose Hours Got Cut

A restaurant server files a complaint with the state labor commissioner about improper tip pool distributions. The employer learns of the complaint and cuts her scheduled hours from 35 per week to 15 per week. The employer offers no reason for the reduction. Under the FLSA, the reduction in hours may qualify as an adverse action. In addition, the close timing between the complaint and the reduction may support a retaliation claim. As a result, she may be entitled to back pay for the lost hours, reinstatement of her prior schedule, and other damages.

Example 3 / The Oil Field Worker Blackballed From Future Work

An oil field worker joins a collective action against his employer alleging unpaid overtime under the day rate structure. After the case settles, the worker applies for jobs with several other operators in the region. He learns that his former employer is telling potential employers not to hire him because he “caused problems.” Under Uronis v. Cabot Oil & Gas, this kind of blacklisting may qualify as retaliation for participation in a protected FLSA proceeding. As a result, he may have a separate claim against his former employer for the lost job opportunities.

What You May Be Able to Recover

Retaliation remedies are among the strongest in federal employment law. Under 29 U.S.C. ยง 216(b), a worker who wins a retaliation claim may be entitled to:

  • Reinstatement to the position the worker held before the retaliation.
  • Back pay for the wages lost between the retaliation and the resolution of the case.
  • Front pay in lieu of reinstatement where returning to the position is not feasible.
  • Liquidated damages equal to the back pay in many cases.
  • Attorney’s fees and court costs, which the FLSA generally requires the employer to pay when the worker prevails.
  • Emotional distress damages in some federal circuits.
  • Punitive damages in some federal circuits.
  • Interest where applicable.

In addition, state laws may add further remedies. For example, some states allow greater emotional distress and punitive damages. Others impose personal liability on individual managers who participated in the retaliation. As a result, workers who face retaliation often recover more from the retaliation claim itself than from the underlying wage claim.

Still, the amount any individual worker may recover depends on the specific facts of the case. Past case outcomes do not guarantee a similar result in any future matter.

Time Limits

Retaliation claims under the FLSA generally must be filed within two years of the retaliatory act. For willful retaliation, the window extends to three years. However, several states allow longer periods. For example, New York allows six years for retaliation claims under NYLL ยง 215. In addition, California retaliation claims under Labor Code ยง 1102.5 have their own timing rules. In contrast, Texas retaliation claims tied to the state Payday Law have shorter windows, though FLSA claims apply separately.

State Laws Often Add More Protection

Many states have their own anti-retaliation statutes that go beyond the FLSA. For example, California prohibits retaliation for reporting wage violations under Labor Code ยง 1102.5, with substantial penalties. Similarly, New York provides broad retaliation protection under NYLL ยง 215, including a rebuttable presumption of retaliation for adverse actions taken within 90 days of a wage complaint. In addition, New Jersey and Illinois provide their own strong protections. As a result, workers may have both federal and state retaliation claims at the same time.

What to Do If You Suspect Retaliation

Document Everything

First, write down exactly what happened. Note the date of your wage complaint, what you said or wrote, and to whom. In addition, document the adverse action the employer took, when it happened, and what the employer said about it. Timing and specifics matter enormously in retaliation cases.

Save All Communications

Next, keep copies of emails, text messages, performance reviews, disciplinary records, and any other written communications. In particular, save documents from before your complaint that show a positive employment record. As a result, you will have evidence to contrast against any post-complaint discipline the employer manufactures.

Identify Witnesses

In addition, note co-workers or others who may have witnessed the retaliation. For example, someone who heard your supervisor make retaliatory statements may be a critical witness. Similarly, someone who observed the change in your treatment after the complaint may support your claim.

Keep Doing Your Job Well

Continue to perform your job to the best of your ability. Do not give the employer legitimate grounds for adverse action. In fact, a strong performance record is one of the best defenses against pretextual discipline.

Consult an Attorney Quickly

Finally, consult an employment attorney as soon as possible. Retaliation cases move fast, and evidence can disappear. In addition, many wage and hour attorneys handle retaliation cases on a contingency-fee basis. As a result, a worker generally pays no attorney’s fees unless the case produces a recovery.

The Law Is on Your Side When You Speak Up

The FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision exists for a reason. Congress recognized that without protection, workers would stay silent. Employers would violate wage laws with impunity. To prevent that outcome, federal law protects workers who file complaints, testify in wage proceedings, or otherwise assert their rights. In addition, courts have interpreted these protections broadly for decades. Whether any particular worker has a valid retaliation claim depends on the specific facts of their employment and the applicable law. Still, if your employer punished you for reporting unpaid overtime or other wage violations, the law may give you the ability to recover reinstatement, back pay, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees, and other damages.

Josephson Dunlap, Lawyers for the Workersยฎ, represents employees nationwide in wage and hour matters, including retaliation cases. We offer confidential case evaluations at no cost.

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship with Josephson Dunlap LLP. Wage and hour laws vary by state, and the application of these laws depends on the specific facts of each situation. The figures and statistics cited above are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change. Prior results in other matters do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. If you believe your wages were not paid correctly, consult a qualified employment attorney licensed in your state. This content complies with the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct regarding attorney advertising.